PART Ⅰ THE REALIST DEBATE 3
1 J.S.Watson (1980),‘A Realistic Jurisprudence of International Law’, The Year Book of World Affairs, 30, pp.265—85 3
2 Anthony D’Amato (1984—5), ‘Is International Law Really “Law”?’, Northwestern University Law Review, 79, pp.1293—314 25
3 Friedrich Kratochwil (1984), ‘Thrasymmachos Revisited: On the Relevance of Norms and the Study of Law for International Relations’, Journal of International Affairs, 37, pp.343—56 47
PART Ⅱ BEYOND REALISM: METHODOLOGICAL CONUNDRUMS 63
4 Philip Allott (1971), ‘Language, Method and the Nature of International Law’, British Year Book of International Law, XLV, pp.79—135 63
5 James Boyle (1985), ‘Ideals and Things: International Legal Scholarship and the Prison-house of Language’, Harvard International Law Journal,26, pp.327—59 121
PART Ⅲ THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY RECONSIDERED 157
6 Thomas M.Franck (1988), ‘Legitimacy in the International System’, The American Journal of International Law, 82, pp.705—59 157
7 Martti Koskenniemi (1990), ‘The Normative Force of Habit: International Custom and Social Theory’, Finnish Yearbook of International Law, 1, pp.77—153 213
PART Ⅳ RETHINKING THE SUBSTANCE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 293
8 David Kennedy (1987), ‘The Sources of International Law’, American University Journal of International Law and Policy, 2, pp.1—96 293
9 Nathaniel Berman (1988), ‘Sovereignty in Abeyance: Self-Determination and International Law’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 7, pp.51—105 389
10Surakiart Sathirathai (1984), ‘An Understanding of the Relationship Between International Legal Discourse and Third World Countries’, Harvard International Law Journal, 25, pp.395-419 445
11Daniel W.Skubik (1986), ‘Two Models for a Rawlsian Theory of International Law and Justice’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 14, pp.231—74. 471
Name Index 515